igorjad
New Member
Hi all,
As you can see in the picture, I had a 3" copper pipe feeding into what looks like an iron 6" pipe connected by a (brass? according to my father-in-law) coupling. The copper pipe sprung a leak. Beyond the hole pictured, the rest of the pipe was paper thin and you could push through if you wanted to, so I had a plumber come in to replace it. He replaced all of the copper and the 90 degree flexible fitting with PVC. The PVC and the brass coupling are the same diameter, so the PVC is just resting on the coupling and is depending on the flexible coupling to stabilize it.
This "solution" has now been leaking since it was implemented. My questions are:
1) Is this a code violation?
2) Should the entire brass coupling have been replaced as well?
3) Any ballpark numbers on what it would cost to do this job correctly?
Thanks in advance.
Igor
As you can see in the picture, I had a 3" copper pipe feeding into what looks like an iron 6" pipe connected by a (brass? according to my father-in-law) coupling. The copper pipe sprung a leak. Beyond the hole pictured, the rest of the pipe was paper thin and you could push through if you wanted to, so I had a plumber come in to replace it. He replaced all of the copper and the 90 degree flexible fitting with PVC. The PVC and the brass coupling are the same diameter, so the PVC is just resting on the coupling and is depending on the flexible coupling to stabilize it.
This "solution" has now been leaking since it was implemented. My questions are:
1) Is this a code violation?
2) Should the entire brass coupling have been replaced as well?
3) Any ballpark numbers on what it would cost to do this job correctly?
Thanks in advance.
Igor