Condensing vs non

Plumbing Forums

Help Support Plumbing Forums:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

mmoreland

New Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2021
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Location
Mendocino, CA
When using a tankless heater for home heat as in a radiant floor, it has occurred to me that using a condensing type heater makes less sense than using a modulating but non-condensing type. I have installed several condensing heaters, and I observe that the returning water is too warm to produce any condensate in the exhaust gasses, so I feel I've spent money unwisely getting the more expensive model. In the systems I've installed where it heats DHW as well as the floor, condensate is produced on the DHW cycle, but not when heating water in the floor loops. Are there any thoughts on this subject?
 
I used a large tankless (Takagi 199,999 btu) in a snowmelt/de-icing application, similar to domestic floor heat. The requirements were a circulation of ~31 gpm but the tankless could only do <5 gpm. So we devised a primary loop/secondary loop scheme to make it work using two pumps and closely spaced tees. In this case despite the modulating burner, I believe it ran 100% fire all the time—often for 6-24 hours at a time.

In your case, your secondary heat exchanger is pre-heating the incoming water. The efficiency is provided by the secondary heat exchanger adding what would be waste heat going out the vent to the incoming water. The condensation if any is determined by temperature differential. If your incoming temperature is higher then you have no condensation…but I don’t think that the heat is wasted. There’s just no condensation in your situation.

BTW at the time I put together this system no commonly available (affordable) tankless except for Takagi would warranty a unit in a recirculating (heating) application.
 
I used a large tankless (Takagi 199,999 btu) in a snowmelt/de-icing application, similar to domestic floor heat. The requirements were a circulation of ~31 gpm but the tankless could only do <5 gpm. So we devised a primary loop/secondary loop scheme to make it work using two pumps and closely spaced tees. In this case despite the modulating burner, I believe it ran 100% fire all the time—often for 6-24 hours at a time.

In your case, your secondary heat exchanger is pre-heating the incoming water. The efficiency is provided by the secondary heat exchanger adding what would be waste heat going out the vent to the incoming water. The condensation if any is determined by temperature differential. If your incoming temperature is higher then you have no condensation…but I don’t think that the heat is wasted. There’s just no condensation in your situation.

BTW at the time I put together this system no commonly available (affordable) tankless except for Takagi would warranty a unit in a recirculating (heating) application.
From your description above I am not able to picture your system, but it seems pretty interesting, and thank you for this reply. Your comment about condensation spoke directly to my question. If the return water is elevated and less energy is exchanged with the flue gasses, then it seems to me the efficiency would be reduced somewhat in proportion to the lack of heat gain from the flue gasses. That was why I wondered if it might not be better to employ a non-condensing modulating heater as there would be one less thing to fail. Incidentally, at this time, Takagi doesn't warranty their heaters for space heating applications.
 
@mmoreland attached was the first generation of the driveway heat system diagram that I used. After installing this, living with it for one season and learning of its faults, I made changes. Live and learn, right??

The first problem (and I kind of suspected this going into it) was the size of the heater. It shows the TK-Jr in that diagram, and that was a 130,000 BTU unit. Too small. I actually needed by calculation later, about 300,000 BTU for optimal operation, but no tankless goes above 199,999 because above that, the Feds consider it a "boiler" and you have all kinds of additional rules and regulations to follow, so they simply don't make them. There were plenty of boilers in all sizes, but I was space limited. So, the largest tankless available, and the only one commonly available was the one to get: the Takagi TK-3. As previously mentioned, at the time of this installation (2009) it was the only one that would certify in a recirculating application. BTW if you need or want more than 199,999 BTU in a tankless, you just cascade them together and some manufacturers make controllers to control a bank of them. I've seen some carwashes that had 4 or 5 of these tankless supplying all the hot water, while more conventional operations (such as the car wash I had) had a 1.2M BTU boiler and an 80 gallon storage tank. In the car wash industry in the upper midwest, the general rule of thumb is that for each car wash "bay" (just about the size of a good single car garage) you need 100,000 BTU...but that's a very generalized statement. My driveway as you can see was about the size of 3 single bays, thus calling for 300,000 BTU. But, a boiler will heat and flow properly; some of them will do 30 GPM. The tankless was limited to about 5 GPM. Hence the circled part called the primary loop/secondary loop practice.

The other fault was those very commonly available stainless steel manifolds--generally used and sold in radiant heat applications for a house--as shown in the photo on the diagram. I had chosen the ones called Everhot. The problem with those is they are not full flow, and in a snowmelt/de-icing application it's all about the flow; you need full flow. So, after the first season with these manifolds and with the smaller TK-Jr. heater, I made a big change. We went with that TK-3 and changed the piping around to custom built manifolds; you can see an example here. They were fabricated with 1.25" copper tubing, on a tee-pulling machine, and ½" stubs brazed on. Then I used full flow ball valves from Dahl Brothers. dahl Valve Limited – Plumbing and Heating Valves Manufacturer in Canada At the time, they had exceedingly limited distribution in the USA, but I found a distributor and ordered a custom set. You choose the body and the size and the fittings and the handles.

Once those changes were made, I then designed and built a control system using a PLC. It worked mostly well, but would have been much better had I had a larger heater. By calculation there was over 40 tons of concrete in my driveway, and heating that from cold to 33-35 degrees doesn't happen fast...but as you can see most of the time the system worked well. Below 15 degrees not so much, but when it gets that cold mostly there's no snow because there has to be clear skies for it to get so cold. Mostly. Polar vortexes and other things started to affect the system and in normal circumstance you "kill it with the extra BTUs" which I did not have at home.

Hope this helps. The only way I got all this knowledge was "baptism by freezing" and owning a car wash in Michigan for many years.

Surprisingly we had the "ideal" operating scenario many times. We'd be watching the news one night, and they'd say it's snowing in Chicago and that was coming to Michigan in about 4-6 hours. So, I'd turn on the driveway system. By the time the snow came, the driveway was just about freezing, and the snow melted. If a short snowfall, we ran it until the sun came out, then turned off the burner but left the pumps running. By mid afternoon that next day, the driveway was BONE DRY. No packed down snow or ice. Then there were the sub-optimal days. A polar vortex, temperatures around 5 degrees, and it snows. May as well not even turn it on, as you'll never heat up 40 tons of concrete with that heater; just wait until it warms up a bit. Get most of the snow off the old fashioned way (by shovel or snowblower) and when the temps go into the 20s, turn the system on and the rest of the snow will disappear.
 

Attachments

  • Driveway Heat System.pdf
    256.9 KB · Views: 0
  • DHS Return Manifold.jpg
    DHS Return Manifold.jpg
    1.9 MB · Views: 0
  • DHS Heat System Control Box Interior.jpg
    DHS Heat System Control Box Interior.jpg
    1.5 MB · Views: 0
  • Heated Driveway 12-14.JPG
    Heated Driveway 12-14.JPG
    1.2 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
When you daisy chain tankless heaters to operate as one, our code requires the btu rating of each tankless must be added together.
 
I've only seen this in operation, never had one myself. I didn't note whether or not the 5-tankless "system" had a brass boiler tag on it. If this is code in Michigan, then only someone with a boiler license could install or service the setup. This is only a small subset of plumbers. Also it would need boiler inspection annually by the State of Michigan, Bureau of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, Boiler Section. A royal PIA with an annual fee.

Even the "boilers" I had (I had a 1.2M for hot water and a 500K for deicing) operated at only 180 degrees, far below the boiling point of water. And they didn't have anything under pressure. But, it wasn't these facts, it was the BTUs that determined whether they are classified as boilers. I just went along with the flow.
 
Back
Top